Comparative study of international commercial arbitration in England, Japan and Russia
dc.contributor.advisor
Reid, E.
en
dc.contributor.author
Yoshida, Ikko
en
dc.date.accessioned
2016-03-15T11:22:48Z
dc.date.available
2016-03-15T11:22:48Z
dc.date.issued
2000-07-20
dc.description.abstract
This thesis examines the law on international commercial arbitration in England,
Japan and Russia with a view to identify those areas for which harmonisation is of the
greatest practical importance. This study is a timely one, since the Arbitration Act 1996 came
into effect on 1st January 1997 in England. In Japan, the Committee of Arbitration formed by
Japanese experts on arbitration prepared the Draft Text of the Law of Arbitration in 1989,
and preparation for amendment based on the UNCITRAL Model Law is under way. In
Russia, the Law on International Commercial Arbitration was established based on the
UNCITRAL Model Law on 7th July 1993.
A comparative study is made of the rules of international private law relating to
arbitration, especially issues on international jurisdiction. Despite of recent development of
unification of law on arbitration such as the 1958 New York Convention and the UNCITRAL
Model Law, there are few rules in this area. This study goes some way towards filling this
gap in the legal framework.
The classification of an arbitration agreement and its influences upon international
private law and law on arbitration are also considered. The issue of classification has been
argued by many commentators usually to attempt to clarify the general characteristics of
arbitration. However, it is the classification of an arbitration agreement that has practical
significance. The classification of an arbitration agreement affects, directly or indirectly, not
only the international private law but also law on arbitration. Its effects extend to the law
applicable to an arbitration agreement, the law applicable to the capacity of a person to enter
into an arbitration agreement, the principle of separability of an arbitration agreement,
assignment of an arbitration agreement, the principle of Kompetentz-Kompetentz, and the
stay of court proceedings on the basis of the existence of an arbitration agreement.
Finally, this comparative study is used as a basis to put forward models for
harmonisation in the interpretation of law on arbitration.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/15757
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Yoshida, Ikko. "Determination of the Seat of Arbitration under the Arbitration Act 1996." Arbitration: the Journal of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Vol. 64, No. 4: pp. 292-294.
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Yoshida, Ikko. "Lessons from the Atlantic Emperor: Some Influence from the Van Uden Case." Arbitration International. Vol. 15, No. 4, 1999: pp. 359-380.
en
dc.subject
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
en
dc.subject
Arbitration (International law)
en
dc.subject
Arbitration and award
en
dc.subject
International commercial arbitration
en
dc.subject
Jurisdiction (International law)
en
dc.title
Comparative study of international commercial arbitration in England, Japan and Russia
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

