How many hillforts are there in western Scotland? Comparing aspects of the size, morphology and landscape position of later prehistoric enclosed sites in Kintyre, Skye and the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright
dc.contributor.advisor
Ralston, Ian
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Halliday, Stratford
en
dc.contributor.author
Wood, Simon Groves
en
dc.date.accessioned
2017-12-21T14:36:06Z
dc.date.available
2017-12-21T14:36:06Z
dc.date.issued
2017-11-27
dc.description.abstract
Hillforts in Scotland are smaller than their counterparts in southern Britain and extremely
difficult to define as a site category. This is even more true in the western and northern
parts of the country traditionally described as Atlantic Scotland, where the plethora of
small enclosed sites forms a continuum in terms of size and morphology that cuts across
the boundaries of current classifications. Using the recent definition of a hillfort by J.D Hill
as a site type that is not a farmstead, this thesis attempts to analyse enclosed sites in terms
of their area enclosed, morphology/architecture and particularly their landscape position
to try to identify groups of sites or individual monuments that are these ‘not-farmsteads’.
Three case study areas have been chosen for GIS-based analysis. Skye and Kintyre are in
Atlantic Scotland. The former is a region where brochs have always been central to
interpretations of the Iron Age, but it has a considerable number of larger hilltop
enclosures classed as forts, and small, less regular drystone enclosures classed as duns.
The forts of Kintyre in Argyll have been more studied, but their social role, as well as their
relationship with and distinctiveness from the duns of Kintyre are still unknown. The final
case study area is the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright, part of Galloway, in Prof. Piggott’s
Solway-Clyde province. Generally included with southern Scotland and the Borders in
syntheses of Scottish prehistory, it has many aspects to its later prehistoric archaeology
that may be considered ‘Atlantic’ in nature, such as small prominent drystone enclosures,
promontory forts and sites with complex, traditionally Atlantic architecture. However,
there are also hilltop enclosures classed as forts that are much larger than in the other two
case study areas.
GIS based analyses have been used, and combined with statistical testing to try to identify
patterns in the landscape positioning of certain classes or sizes of enclosed site. Sites have
been analysed in terms of their distance from the sea, altitude, topographic prominence,
visibility in the landscape, and proximity to/visibility of agricultural land. These results have
been interpreted to try to refine present site categorisations, and to attempt to identify
those sites that are different from merely farmsteads.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25814
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
hillforts
en
dc.subject
GIS
en
dc.subject
archaeology
en
dc.subject
Iron Age Scotland
en
dc.subject
Early historic
en
dc.subject
Dunadd
en
dc.subject
Kintyre
en
dc.subject
Skye
en
dc.subject
Galloway
en
dc.title
How many hillforts are there in western Scotland? Comparing aspects of the size, morphology and landscape position of later prehistoric enclosed sites in Kintyre, Skye and the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Wood2017.pdf
- Size:
- 36.25 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

