Eternity and the constitution: the promise and limits of eternity clauses
dc.contributor.advisor
Tierney, Stephen
dc.contributor.advisor
Walker, Neil
dc.contributor.author
Suteu, Silvia
dc.date.accessioned
2023-04-25T15:16:58Z
dc.date.available
2023-04-25T15:16:58Z
dc.date.issued
2016-06-30
dc.description.abstract
This thesis sets out to investigate whether eternity clauses—unamendable
provisions in constitutions—are democratic. It proceeds to answer this question in
two parts. The thesis's first three chapters look at eternity clauses' foundations and
at the substantive values they protect, in an effort to ascertain whether
unamendability and democracy may be reconciled based on these provisions'
origins and normative content. The thesis's latter two chapters are concerned with
identifying process-based alternatives to, or ways out of, unamendability. They call
into question the possibility of revolution to do away with eternity clauses and also
provide an initial investigation into the relationship between the macro-trends of
rigidity and popular participation present in constitution-making today. The
argument ultimately put forth is that eternity clauses and democracy remain in a
state of tension with each other irrespective of the manner in which they are
adopted, of the values they protect, and of the fact that they may in theory be
repealed via a new constituent moment. This is because they institute a hierarchy of
norms within constitutions, which is then zealously guarded by constitutional
courts with or without an explicit mandate to do so. More often than not, that
hierarchy contains first-order value commitments of the polity which these courts
can only review with reference to judicial ideology rather than any objective
standard of review. This is the inevitable outcome of the logic of unamendable
entrenchment, and not merely its exception.
en
dc.identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/40536
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3302
dc.language.iso
en
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Silvia Suteu, "Constitutional Conventions in the Digital Era: Lessons from Iceland and Ireland", Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, Vol. XXXVIII, No. 2 (2015), pp. 251-76
en
dc.subject
Eternity Clauses
en
dc.subject
unamendable provisions
en
dc.subject
constitutions
en
dc.subject
democracy
en
dc.subject
process-based alternatives
en
dc.subject
judicial ideology
en
dc.title
Eternity and the constitution: the promise and limits of eternity clauses
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- SuteuS_2016.pdf
- Size:
- 23.03 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

