Integrating transaction cost and institutional theories in an emerging market context: the case of the Tiger Leaping Gorge, Southwest China
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Abstract
The aim of this thesis is to explore the applicability of transaction cost theory to an
emerging market context, and to complement it with institutional theory to achieve a
closer fit. The research questions are:
(1) Which causes of high transaction costs are perceived by firms in the research
site?
(2) How do they respond to these costs? The responses could range from
internalisation, through cooperation, to the new concept of trading isolation,
which is the first of two observed gaps in the literature.
(3) Could an institutional perspective help to explain firms’ responses, if they differ
from what is expected by theory? The consideration of informal institutions with
regard to transaction costs in China addresses the second observed gap in the
literature, which focuses mostly on formal institutions.
Despite the strengths of transaction cost theory in identifying sources of friction in
exchange and proposing resolutions, it has been criticised for making assumptions
concerning behaviour and the strength of formal institutions that reduce the degree to
which it applies in non-Western, emerging market research contexts. This thesis
explores these limitations in the context of the inbound tourism sector in the Tiger
Leaping Gorge, in rural Yunnan Province, Southwest China. The author’s
exploratory study had suggested that some of these firms attempted to reduce
transaction costs by decreasing the number of transactions conducted, resulting in
their relative isolation from – rather than integration into – a trading network. This
hinders the firms’ ability to develop and specialise, limiting their contribution to
local economic growth in this relatively undeveloped region of China.
In the principal field study, qualitative data were collected through interviews
conducted with the proprietors of the population of tourism firms in the research site. The interviews sought to understand the transaction costs the proprietors perceived,
their views of institutional strength or weakness (in areas including local
government, legal system, financing, development of trust, kinship, guanxi and
networks), and the ways they organised their firms. The data were explored first with
a thematic analysis, then by coding into fuzzy sets for analysis with the Qualitative
Comparative Approach to help identify causal associations between transaction
costs, institutions, and responses of isolation from or integration into the market.
The main causes of transaction costs were found to be opportunism, uncertainty and
bounded rationality. High transaction costs were generally associated with a response
of isolation, but they were not the sole causal factor: every isolated firm reported
weak informal institutions combined with a variety of transaction cost and formal
institutional conditions. The difficulty of establishing new trust relationships
increased the isolation of the worst-affected firms, in an environment where weak
formal protection from transaction risks confined many firms to personal exchange.
A recommendation for local practice is made for firms to attempt to broaden the
networks within which they develop trust, to reduce the constraint of personal
exchange and consequent isolation. Two policy recommendations are made that
could apply here and in emerging markets more generally: a mainstream
recommendation to strengthen the enforcement of formal institutions, aiming to
facilitate rule-based, impersonal exchange based on generalised trust, and an
alternative approach deriving recommendations from the local context and including
the consideration of informal institutions.
This thesis contributes to theory by highlighting the critical influence of informal
social structures on the cost and extent of exchange, and adapting transaction cost
theory to better apply to this institutional context. It also constitutes a novel
application of the Qualitative Comparative Approach to interview data.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

