Gene environment interplay in depression
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Chuong, Tugce Melisa Sau
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder and one of the
leading causes of disability worldwide. MDD is moderately heritable (~3040%),
suggesting both genetic and environmental effects are influential. Several strands
of evidence point to the possible presence of geneenvironment correlations and
geneenvironment interaction effects in MDD, although findings to date have been
relatively inconsistent.
Recently, research using available genetic and environmental data on biological
parents and offspring (trios), have shown that parental genetic nurturing effects are
detectable using polygenic scores (PGSs) in more heritable traits such as
educational attainment. Research findings also point to potential genebytrauma
exposure interaction effects involved in MDD. It is evident that data limitations may
result in power issues, confounding effects and biases, which impact reliable and
accurate quantification of these effects, highlighting the need for methods that
maximise statistical power and minimise bias and confounding when exploring
these effects.
This thesis aims to adapt existing statistical frameworks and use of data to explore
geneenvironment interplay effects, which are robust to the limitations of the
available data. Here, two large populationscale datasets, the UK Biobank
(N~150,000) and Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study (N~2680 trios),
were utilised to explore genomebytrauma exposure interaction effects in
depression, as well as parental genetic nurturing effects in a range of traits
including MDD.
The research aims of this thesis included (1) implementing models exploring
parental genetic nurturing effects using available trio PGSs; (2) expanding these
models to explore mechanisms of genetic nurturing effects with available parental
phenotypic data, both addressed in chapter 2. Here, the quantification of parental
genetic nurturing effects using trio PGSs was found to be reliable and robust to data
limitations. However, expanding these models by including parental phenotypes
resulted in confounded effects. Simulation analyses demonstrated that the
confounding was induced by power issues associated with PGSs, highlighting the
need for improved measures of genetic variance. The final research aim (3) was to
explore genomebytrauma exposure interaction effects using relationship matrices
capturing genetic, trauma exposure and genomebytrauma exposure interaction
similarity between participants. Genomic relationship matrices utilised all available
genetic data, and thus, served as an improved representation of genetic variance.
Environmental relationship matrices utilised principal components, capturing
underlying dimensions of trauma exposure. A substantial proportion of MDD
variance was found to be attributed to genetic, trauma exposure and genome-by-trauma interaction effects. However, little insight was inferred regarding the
specificity and direction of trauma exposure involved in MDD manifestation, due to
the difficulty in interpreting the underlying dimensions of trauma exposure.
The two studies provide a strong rationale for the use of improved measures of
genetic and environmental components of MDD. Specifically, findings from chapter
2 highlight the need for measures that capture a substantial proportion of genetic
variance to explore these complex geneenvironment interplay effects. Chapter 3
results demonstrated how leveraging all available genetic data can uncover
substantial effects that were previously missed. Evaluations of study designs
highlight how future work can incorporate omics (e.g. methylation) data to improve
measures of environmental factors, which would aid translational interpretation of
results obtained from these models. Methylation data could help identify additional
trait associated genetic loci as well as their mode of action, and hence, specific drug
targets; which may not have been previously identified by traditional analyses such
as genomewide association studies (GWAS) not containing the relevant genetic
variants.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

