Social life of paper in Edinburgh c.1770 – c.1820
Files
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Friend, Claire Louise
Abstract
Previous research on paper history has tended to be conducted from an economic
perspective and/or as part of the field of book history within a broadly literary framework.
This has resulted in understandings of paper history being book-centric and focused on
production. We now have a great deal of knowledge about the physical process of hand
paper-making, a good knowledge of the actors involved and where in the country paper was
manufactured, but there is still very little scholarly discussion of the people, processes and
practices associated with paper outside of the mill.
Taking inspiration from eighteenth-century ‗it-narratives‘, this thesis takes a holistic
approach to the paper trade – loosely based around the framework of social life theory as
expounded by Arjun Appadurai and Igor Kopytoff. It encompasses a case study of the rag-collection
and paper-wholesale operations of a single Edinburgh firm, a wider examination
of paper-retailing in Edinburgh, a look at the ownership of desks in Edinburgh alongside a
consideration of advice and instruction relating to desk-use, and closes with an examination
of the papers owned by a notable Edinburgh family. The first three chapters consider the
scope of the Edinburgh paper trade. Moving through distinct stages in the life of paper, these
chapters begin with an account of the Edinburgh rag-trade. Business records relating to the
Balerno Company‘s rag-buying operations reveal an active and organised network with
connections to a variety of trades. Continuing the focus on the Balerno Company, the second
chapter considers the company as paper-wholesalers. It demonstrates that the driving force
behind their operations was not the supply of paper for the booktrade but rather the
provision of wrapping papers for the purposes of commerce. Using advertisements in local
newspapers the third chapter looks at the reach of paper-selling beyond the booktrades. The
final two chapters move gradually from the commercial to the personal. Chapter four
considers the presentation of desk-use in penmanship manuals and the evidence of desk-ownership
in confirmation inventories. Both of which are suggestive of a growing mercantile
interest in desk furniture. Finally, this thesis closes by looking at the paper archives of the
Innes family of Stow in order to examine the extent to which the findings of previous
chapters is reflected in the collection, retention and use of papers across two generations of
this family.
Overall, this thesis demonstrates the value of adopting an inclusive approach to the study of
paper history, as doing so opens up a multifaceted world of paper. Paper history has tended
to be understood as the history of writing and printing paper sold by booksellers and
stationers. The social life approach allows connections to be made between materials,
artefacts and trades; to gain a fuller understanding of the role paper played in people‘s lives.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

