Samuel Clarke's Scripture-doctrine of the Trinity and the controversy it aroused
dc.contributor.author
Asch, E. Dorothy
en
dc.date.accessioned
2019-02-15T14:21:16Z
dc.date.available
2019-02-15T14:21:16Z
dc.date.issued
1951
dc.description.abstract
en
dc.description.abstract
The writing of a "book may be a dangerous thing.
This was found to be true by Samuel Clarke, philosopher
and divine of the Church of England during the last part
of the seventeenth and the beginning of the eighteenth
centuries
en
dc.description.abstract
Clarke had been studying intensively on the
subject of the Trinity, and at last he arrived at some
conclusions which he thought would help others to come
more readily to an understanding of this vital doctrine
of the Christian faith. These conclusions he published
in 1712, in a book called The Scripture-Doctrine of the
Trinity and the reception it received was comparable
only with that offered by water to a piece of red hot
metal, submerged for cooling purposes.
en
dc.description.abstract
Trinitarian controversy was not a new thing in
England: as late as the end of the seventeenth century,
there had been such a controversy with Bishop George
Bull as the leader of Orthodoxy. This had just died
down when Clarke's book appeared to revitalize what had
seemed dead. It started at least three separate controversies.
They were: the controversy in which Clarke
and his ideas were the targets of men's blows, that with
which this thesis will concern itself; that in which
certain Trinitarians argued among themselves; and that
among the Dissenters leading to the Slaters' Hall controversy
and also to Unitarianism later in the century.
en
dc.description.abstract
This thesis will consist of four main parts. The
first will briefly sketch in the necessary background;
the second will concern itself with Clarke, the man and
his thought—mainly his theological thought, his philosophy
having been sufficiently dealt with elsewhere—;
the third will concern itself with the book and the controversy
as such; the last will indicate any conclusions
we may have been able to reach.
en
dc.description.abstract
Wherever it is possible, the material will be
grouped. In other words, if several men have said the
same thing, either one will be quoted, or the gist of
what has been said by them will be given. This has been
done, because, with the wealth of material found,
quotations from each person writing on the subject would
prove unwieldy and tiring to the reader. Much of the
material on this subject has been found to be irrelevant,
in that the writers spent so much time abusing each other
that they came but slowly to the point of the argument.
For this reason, the reader may be inclined to find this
resume, if he wishes to call it that, rather shorter
than he had expected. It is hoped that this will not
prove displeasing, and that what material is gathered
here will shed some light on a controversy and a man
"both long dead.
en
dc.description.abstract
It is also to be hoped that, although no
attempt is made to vindicate any of Clarke's heretical
ideas, his thought may be scrutinized in such a way as
to point out wherein he was an orthodox thinker, thus
clearing his name, if possible, of part or all of the
stain it has carried through these years.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33895
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.ispartof
Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2019 Block 22
en
dc.relation.isreferencedby
en
dc.title
Samuel Clarke's Scripture-doctrine of the Trinity and the controversy it aroused
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- AschED_1951redux.pdf
- Size:
- 22.86 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

