Quakerly conflict:the cultural logic of conflict in the Religious Society of Friends
Files
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Kline, Douglas Aaron
Abstract
Positioned outside popular Quaker discourse, yet vital to their practices and identity,
nestles the notion of 'conflict'. This comment does require some qualifications, and.
as you will discover, nearly all statements about Friends require some recognition of
their complexity. The concept of 'conflict' is not central to Quaker understanding,
but it has an interesting relationship with the other concepts that inform Quaker
beliefs and practices. Friends direct their attention and practice to peace, integrity,
simplicity, and equality. Their organisation, practice, and cultural schema are
manifestations of these ideas, establishing a context that produces a unique
construction of 'conflict' and its management. Quakers are known for their stance
against war, and they earn international reputation as a group who works towards
peace in armed conflicts throughout the world. These are the conflicts that dominate
the Quaker imagination, so how do Friends manage dispute when it occurs in their
own meeting houses? This is the question I explore in this thesis. Argument is
fundamental in the formulation of religious belief and practices, the problem arises
for Quakers when conflicts arise. How do they contain conflicts, and implement
social control? I investigate conflict as a culturally informed context where
particular behaviours are promoted when divergence of interests are perceived. The
Religious Society of Friends in Scotland provides the ethnographic setting and
specific context for this investigation.
This chapter sets the foundation of the research, and explores issues that will
assist the reader in understanding the ethnography. There are particular biases that
require elaboration, so my position in the field location, and the heuristics involved
with the writing are elaborated. In this chapter, I establish my epistemological and
methodological approaches in trying to answer the orienting question and I do this in
three sections. I open with a statement on my location within the model by sharing
my narrative, giving some intimate reasons for the fieldwork, and shedding light on
my relationship to the work and with the Friends I met. Next I address the themes
that this research explores as I try to understand conflict through the Quaker
understanding, and its practice of management. Finally, I conclude with the methods
used to obtain my information.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

