Biorobotic investigation of multimodal cue integration for insect orientation
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Mitchell, Robert
Abstract
Insects are capable of great feats of navigation; these range from relatively
simple straight-line orientation over a few metres to migration
over hundreds of kilometres. A robust compass is therefore critical,
and to this end, an animal may use multiple orientation cues simultaneously
(a behaviour known as cue integration). Recent work has indicated
that ball rolling dung beetles perform cue integration during straightline
orientation. This thesis explores dung beetle cue integration using
a biorobotic approach, with the goal of understanding how this process
could be implemented in the insect brain.
We start by adapting the standard Bayesian approach from human
psychophysics to compare mathematical models of cue integration behaviour,
assuming that dung beetles weight cues according to their reliability
(the inverse of their variance). This modelling indicates that beetle
cue integration is likely represented by a vector sum which: (1) aligns
well with a candidate neural substrate, and (2) can generate a variety
of behaviours depending on how the cue weights are set (providing behavioural
flexibility despite functionally conserved neuroanatomy).
It has previously been proposed that orientation cues are integrated
in a set of neurons known as EPGs which receive input from ‘R’ neurons
via highly plastic connections. Recent evidence has shown that different
sets of R neurons encode different cue modalities. Using a computational
model, we argue that R neurons could encode vectors as sinusoidal activity
across their population and the resultant input to the EPGs represents
a vector sum. The model can account for the vector sum, and
provides a possible mechanistic explanation for the dung beetle orientation
snapshot. Further, the work suggests that a number of factors
may contribute to total cue influence; specifically, cue weight, cue reliability,
and synaptic strength (which is affected by weight and reliability
independently). Moreover, we show that reliability does not seem
to be the major factor which determines cue influence in dung beetles
(using a combination of modelling and animal behaviour). This result
stands in contrast to the vast majority of literature on cue integration, including
all previous accounts in insects which discuss concrete models,
and prompts a critical re-examination of the explanatory power of the
Bayesian approach to cue integration.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

