Architecture of surface : the significance of surficial thought and topological metaphors of design
dc.contributor.advisor
Coyne, Richard
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Dorrian, Mark
en
dc.contributor.author
Islami, Seyed Yahya
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
University of Edinburgh
en
dc.date.accessioned
2011-03-28T14:09:18Z
dc.date.available
2011-03-28T14:09:18Z
dc.date.issued
2009
dc.description.abstract
In the early twentieth century, the modernists problematized ornament in their
refashioning of architecture for the industrial age. Today, architects are formulating
different responses to image and its (re)production in the information age. In both
discourses of ornament and image, surfaces are often the perpetrators: visual
boundaries that facilitate false appearances, imprisoning humanity in a shadowy
cave of illusion. Such views follow a familiar metaphysical model characterized by
the opposition between inside and outside and the opaque boundary that acts as a
barrier. This model determines the traditional (Platonic) philosophical approach
that follows a distinct hierarchical order and a perpendicular movement of thought
that seeks to penetrate appearances in order to arrive at the essence of things.
This thesis deploys Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy to advance a different
understanding of surface, image and appearance in architecture. Using the Bilbao
Guggenheim Museum as a catalyst, the thesis argues that many of the concepts with
which commentators and critics analyse contemporary architecture follow models
of thought that consider surfaces and their effects as secondary categories. Given the
significance of visual (re)production and communication for contemporary society,
the thesis proposes a different model based on surface as that which simultaneously
produces, connects and separates image and reality. This non-hierarchical approach
is inspired by surficial philosophy, which relates to Earth, to geology and topology,
conjuring up a diversity of concepts from the thickness of the crust to the smooth
fluidity of the seas. The result is an unfamiliar, polemical model of thought that
does not define surface as a limit or barrier, rather a medium, a pliable space of
smooth mixture. In this model, difference is not in the opposition between the two
sides of a boundary line, rather it occurs upon and within the surficial landscape
that consumes categories, promoting nomadic movements of thought that offer
greater flexibility towards creativity and new possibilities.
In surficial thought, images and appearances are not artificial copies of an
originary reality, rather they possess a unique reality of their own. This approach
allows architectural imagery to be theorised as a positive surfacing of architecture
beyond disciplinary lines and the locality of a specific time and place.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/4845
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
architectural theory
en
dc.subject
surface
en
dc.subject
image
en
dc.subject
appearance
en
dc.subject
ornament
en
dc.subject
simulacra
en
dc.subject
Deleuze
en
dc.subject
Derrida
en
dc.subject
Baudrillard
en
dc.title
Architecture of surface : the significance of surficial thought and topological metaphors of design
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Islami2009.pdf
- Size:
- 24.66 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

