Between stoicism and intimacy: the social construction of paternal love
dc.contributor.advisor
Jamieson, Lynn
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Holmes, Mary
en
dc.contributor.author
Macht, Alexandra Georgiana
en
dc.contributor.sponsor
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
en
dc.date.accessioned
2017-07-27T13:27:18Z
dc.date.available
2017-07-27T13:27:18Z
dc.date.issued
2017-07-05
dc.description.abstract
In the current sociological literature, there is very little research on the subject of the love shared
between parents and children, and contemporary intimate father’s role in connection to Scottish
and Romanian masculinities. Drawing from the aesthetic theory of emotions postulated by Ian
Burkitt (2014) and from Esther Dermott’s (2008) reframing of modern fatherhood according to
intimacy theory, the present research has looked at a specific group of men’s experiences of love.
As such, it sees involved fathers as embedded in an intimate network of relationships: to their
children, their partner and their own parents.
Presenting results from 47 qualitative semi-structured interviews with a sample of middle-class
and working-class, resident and non-resident, Romanian and Scottish fathers, the study explored
fathers’ embeddedness in a particular class, culture and family configuration in relation to what
guides them to adopt certain forms of emotionality. Results show that involved fathers
understand love primarily as an activity (it is something they do), in which both love and power
are intermingled, as power in the context of fathering is deeply relational, and socially-constructed
as much as love is. In order to maintain loving relationships to their children,
involved fathers also do emotion work in discursive and embodied ways. Providing is influenced
by the intimate father’s discourse, which has permeated both cultures due to globalization and is
increasingly commodified, but fathers can also resist this discourse. The cultural perspective of
their fathering has more similarities in common than differences, while class differences appear
more prominently, further emphasizing structural inequalities in how love can then be practised.
Therefore, the ways in which fathers express their emotions are balanced between the masculine
emotional demands of stoicism and the novel discursive prerogative for intimate self-disclosure
(or between love and detachment). To help us understand how these tensions are created and
then resolved, I have developed the concept of ‘emotional bordering’ from Barrie Thorne’s
concept of gender borders (1993). Ultimately, it is argued that investigating love in relation to
culturally-diverse masculinities as they interact with the intimate father’s role can offer
sociologists a fresh perspective on intimate inequalities by further enhancing the vulnerability of
the concept of ‘hegemonic masculinity’. It can also give a different understanding to the role of
ideals in the nexus of family practices, into which practices of love and of fathering are
embedded.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/22990
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
en
dc.rights.uri
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subject
stoicism
en
dc.subject
intimacy
en
dc.subject
involved fathers
en
dc.subject
Scotland
en
dc.subject
Romania
en
dc.subject
children
en
dc.title
Between stoicism and intimacy: the social construction of paternal love
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

